This is a first. Hayden wrote this lovely, lovely piece on Pearl. And since I just covered how I saw myself in a character, it’s my honor to share the same. So it is with great pleasure I open the floor.
So I saw Ti West’s “X” back when it came out and loved it. The grungy aesthetic and performances made some old tropes feel fresh to me. It had sympathy for most, if not all, of its characters, which was refreshing in a lot of the misanthropy I’m admittedly used to in the horror genre. When a stealth prequel was announced, I would classify myself as cautiously optimistic. Soon after, I saw the trailer and was hooked. Femme fatale movies are a drug of choice and I went into the movie extremely hyped. Little did I expect that this movie would impact me in the profound way that it did. Whether intentional or not, “Pearl” felt so authentic to my experience on the autistic spectrum.
Before I officially begin, I should preface that every autistic individual is different and this is merely to express why I personally got something out of the film. Furthermore, I feel I should also clarify that when I say the film’s protagonist is relatable, that does not mean that I endorse any of her murderous actions, nor would I replicate them.
If you haven’t seen the film, “Pearl” is about a lonely woman living in Middle of Nowhere, Texas. Her husband is away fighting in World War I and she’s forced to look after her incapacitated father with her domineering mother. Pearl has big aspirations and an even bigger ego. This ultimately leads to her full transformation into the woman we see in “X.” So why do I think the character of Pearl exemplifies autism?
First off, Pearl is outright stated to have issues with commonly understood social cues. She also seems to have a special interest in movies/dancing as a way to cope. It goes without saying that these are some of the most well known symptoms of autistic spectrum disorder. But I feel it goes even deeper.
One aspect of the movie that I find notable is the use of face masks. The movie is set in 1918 around the time of the influenza pandemic which was a smart way to get around COVID restrictions at the time of feeling but it greatly serves my thesis as well.
For the uninitiated, “masking” is a term widely used in the autistic community that refers to learning neurotypical behaviors and replicating them when talking to other people. It’s a survival strategy to avoid ridicule and shame in a society that often doesn’t understand us. It is also deeply draining because you are constantly withholding aspects of yourself.
Keeping this in mind, Pearl seems to utilize masking throughout the film. It is stated that she hides her true self from her husband and other people in an extended monologue delivered beautifully in one take by star and co-writer Mia Goth. I don’t know how tuned in Goth and West are to autistic terminologies but it is certainly an intriguing coincidence.
Early on in the film, Pearl meets a handsome projectionist who takes an interest in her and the feeling is mutual. He proclaims that with everybody wearing masks “it’s hard to know who anyone is nowadays.”
At one point, our protagonist tells the farm animals “y’all see me for who I really am.” While in context this reflects her ego in thinking she’s a future star, I think it simultaneously establishes she only feels free to be herself around the animals who look on her with neutral faces. Indeed, this mask fully slips when she brings the unnamed Projectionist to her farm and shows him the animals.
His reaction is one that a lot of us on the spectrum know very well. It’s a look of discomfort very common when we forget to mask for a single second. He begins backing away from Pearl (admittedly not entirely without reason). When she asks him what she did wrong, he assures her that she did nothing but she knows otherwise. “I feel things very deeply,” Pearl responds. It should be stated that while we often don’t have a full handle on commonly accepted social cues, this can manifest as a hypersensitivity to peoples’ reactions. We are not entirely oblivious. Whether internalized or not, there can be an intuition when you’ve accidentally said something awkward or uncouth. And my heart shattered at this point because I have been there.
In the aforementioned monologue, Pearl says to her sister-in-law Mitsy that “there’s something missing in [her] that the rest of the world has.” This ultimately cuts to the autistic experience more succinctly than this thinkpiece. I’m grateful that I have a lot of the resources that she does not. I have a support system and we know so much more now about ASD than she did in 1918.
Some people might feel that films about mental illness/neurodivergence leading to a path of destruction are inherently ableist but to me, they can be immensely cathartic. When I feel like my brain’s anxiety is taking control, I can watch a movie to live out a nightmare scenario in a healthy way. A vessel for the messy thoughts that we’re all capable of to some capacity. And I think the beauty of art is that it often reflects the imperfections of those both creating and watching it.